GAYS & ANGLICANS

At their meeting this week-end in Winnipeg,  the Anglican church of Canada first voted that blessing gay marriages did not contradict the church’s core beliefs, then turned around and, by a narrow margin, voted against blessing gay marriages.

      What in the world is going on here?  For 10 years the church has been debating this subject in the context of its view of homosexuality.   Now with this rejection of same sex blessings, many gay people and their supporters are preparing to leave the church.

       How did homosexuality become such a deal breaker?  Are Anglican bishops in Canada knuckling under to their benighted counterparts in Africa who view homosexuality as a grave sin?  Grave enough to break up a church that has existed for 500 years.

       If homosexuality is that serious wouldn’t you think that Jesus would have mentioned it in his public ministry?  Wouldn’t he have condemned it the way he condemned adultery?  In fact, so far as I am aware he never once mentioned homosexuality.  Certainly he never condemned it.

     Furthermore the view of some Anglican bishops (and the church of Rome) that a loving God created upwards of five per cent of the human race as intrinsically perverted is absurd.  If Jesus was to return to earth today would he exclude even active homosexuals from a church blessing?  Hardly. Jesus’ whole ministry was inclusive, not exclusive.  Isn’t it high time Anglican bishops recognized this and gave up their tub-thumping on sin  to please the bishops in Nigeria?

Advertisements

4 Comments »

  1. 1
    Barbara Says:

    They are buying time, Neil. As with many churches, official statements and what happens at ground or pastoral level, often diverge.

  2. 2
    SUZANNE Says:

    Jesus didn’t need to condemn it, because it was understood to be wrong by Jews of the time. He only told people things they didn’t know.

    “Furthermore the view of some Anglican bishops (and the church of Rome) that a loving God created upwards of five per cent of the human race as intrinsically perverted is absurd.”

    If having a sinful desire is intrinsically perverted, we all are. God is entitled to make imperfect people.

    It is more loving to love the imperfect than to love the perfect.

  3. 3
    Barbara Says:

    “Jesus didn’t need to condemn it, because it was understood to be wrong by Jews of the time. He only told people things they didn’t know.”

    Regardless of one’s position on the appropriate Christian attitude towards homoxesuality, I find the above statement questionable.

    Frankly, in many instances Jesus condemned acts that were identified as wrong in the Law (murder, adultery, blasphemy, etc.). I find that Jesus does not so much introduce a new teaching of morality as fulfill or illuminate what God has already written in our hearts and in the Law, if only we were not so hard of heart.

  4. 4
    SUZANNE Says:

    “Frankly, in many instances Jesus condemned acts that were identified as wrong in the Law (murder, adultery, blasphemy, etc.). ”

    He didn’t have to tell people murder was wrong. He didn’t have to tell people adultery was wrong. He didn’t have to tell people blasphemy was wrong. It was all in the law.


RSS Feed for this entry

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: